Saturday, October 01, 2005
I love [insert your name here]
It's good, of course, to be able to personalize a cover letter when you send a poem packet somewhere--either by knowing the editor or having a connection with him/her--or at least use the letter to indicate you know something about the journal, whether it be that you have a subscription or that you at least read the samples on the web and found some similarity to your own work.
Do not, however, think it's a good idea to try to falsify research by regurgitating whatever's in the Poet's Market or Dust Books entry with no further effort--e.g., don't say "I would like to be published by the same journal that published" Poet X who was in the listing. If you're going to claim to be a fan of a journal, try to have at least one thing to say that a fan might know--something that you can't find on the website or in the market listing. And for God's sake, if you are attempting to bluff familiarity, don't get caught in a lie. I mind patently false research more than I mind a generic "Dear Editor" template letter.
Do not, however, think it's a good idea to try to falsify research by regurgitating whatever's in the Poet's Market or Dust Books entry with no further effort--e.g., don't say "I would like to be published by the same journal that published" Poet X who was in the listing. If you're going to claim to be a fan of a journal, try to have at least one thing to say that a fan might know--something that you can't find on the website or in the market listing. And for God's sake, if you are attempting to bluff familiarity, don't get caught in a lie. I mind patently false research more than I mind a generic "Dear Editor" template letter.
Comments:
<< Home
Well, the story's pretty much in the post. Got a cover letter for a submission that committed all of the above, including claiming that our website had no sample poems on it, which is odd, given that I posted eight poems from the 2004 and 2005 editions myself.
I had someone tell me that they liked Joe Schmoo's poem, which they said they read in issue 1. They must have seen that poet listed on the web site. Since we didn't get Joe's contract, we pushed his poem from issue #1 to #2. But the web site still said his poem was coming out in issue #1. Oops! I caught that poet in a lie. And we did not accept their poems.
Post a Comment
<< Home

